Female dating violence best dating website seniors
It was originally developed for family physicians, but subsequently has been tested in the emergency department.It has been found to have good internal reliability and acceptable concurrent validity.Teen dating violence can be prevented, especially when there is a focus on reducing risk factors as well as fostering protective factors, and when teens are empowered through family, friends, and others (including role models such as teachers, coaches, mentors, and youth group leaders) to lead healthy lives and establish healthy relationships.It is important to create spaces, such as school communities, where the behavioral norms are not tolerant of abuse in dating relationships.The World Health Organization (WHO) defines IPV as "...any behaviour within an intimate relationship that causes physical, psychological or sexual harm to those in the relationship, including acts of physical aggression, sexual coercion, psychological abuse and controlling behaviors." The most extreme form of such violence may be termed battering, intimate terrorism, coercive controlling violence, or simply coercive control, in which one person is violent and controlling; this is generally perpetrated by men against women, and is the most likely of the types to require medical services and the use of a women's shelter.This information diverged significantly from shelter, hospital, and police data, initiating a long-standing debate, termed "the gender symmetry debate".
It was created to detect abuse perpetrated against pregnant women.
This tool was Initially developed and tested among family physicians and family practice offices, and since then has been evaluated in diverse outpatient settings.
Internal reliability and concurrent validity are acceptable.
If the abuse is more severe, it is more likely to have chronic effects on victims because the long-term effects of abuse tend to be cumulative.
Intimate terrorism batterers include two types: "Generally-violent-antisocial" and "dysphoric-borderline".
Violent resistance on its own is non-reciprocal, but is reciprocal when in response to intimate terrorism.